Biodiesel & alternative fuel help, news, views and discussions
Loading
Generic Content

Regional Forums » USACanadaAfricaEuropeChinaIndiaIndonesiaPakistanCentral/South AmericaAustralia/NZ | Algae | Alternative Energy
Biodiesel » FAQProductionCold WeatherAdvanced MethodsBusinessBioHeatVehiclesMarine | Classifieds » VehiclesEquipmentJobsOil

Very interesting journal article on renewable oil production from photosythetic microbes

Algae

Visit our Algae Blog and Algae Forum.

Upload your files, photos or YouTube videos to our File Area.

Very interesting journal article on renewable oil production from photosythetic microbes

  • rated by 0 users
  • This post has 3 Replies |
  • 1 Follower
  • CO2 MITIGATION AND RENEWABLE OIL FROM PHOTOSYNTHETIC MICROBES: A NEW APPRAISAL

    MARK E. HUNTLEY1 and DONALD G. REDALJE2

    1International Center for Climate and Society, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology,

    University of Hawaii, Manoa, East-West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

    2Department of Marine Science, University of Southern Mississippi, 1020 Balch Boulevard,

    Stennis Space Center, Mississippi 39529

    Journal : Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (2007) 12: 573–608

    (Author for correspondence: E-mail: mhuntley@hawaii.edu, Tel: (808) 325-0779)

    Abstract. The only major strategy now being seriously considered for biological mitigation of atmospheric

    CO2 relies entirely on terrestrial plants. Photosynthetic microbes were the focus of similar

    consideration in the 1990s. However, two major government-sponsored research programs in Japan

    and the USA concluded that the requisite technology was not feasible, and those programs were

    terminated after investing US$117 million and US$25 million, respectively. We report here on the

    results of a privately funded US$20 million program that has engineered, built, and successfully

    operated a commercial-scale (2 ha), modular, production system for photosynthetic microbes. The

    production system couples photobioreactors with open ponds in a two-stage process – a combination

    that was suggested, but never attempted – and has operated continuously for several years to

    produce Haematococcus pluvialis. The annually averaged rate of achieved microbial oil production

    from H. pluvialis is equivalent to >420 GJ ha 1 yr1, which exceeds the most optimistic estimates

    of biofuel production from plantations of terrestrial “energy crops.” The maximum production rate

    achieved to date is equivalent to 1014 GJ ha1 yr1. We present evidence to demonstrate that a rate

    of 3200 GJ ha1 yr1 is feasible using species with known performance characteristics under conditions

    that prevail in the existing production system. At this rate, it is possible to replace reliance

    on current fossil fuel usage equivalent to 300 EJ yr1 – and eliminate fossil fuel emissions of CO2

    of 6.5 GtC yr1 – using only 7.3% of the surplus arable land projected to be available by 2050.

    By comparison, most projections of biofuels production from terrestrial energy crops would require

    in excess of 80% of surplus arable land. Oil production cost is estimated at $84/bbl, assuming no

    improvements in current technology. We suggest enhancements that could reduce cost to $50/bbl or

    less.

     

  • http://www.drfriendly.tv/PDFs/Huntley+Redalje200611.pdf

    A link to the whole paper.

    flectere si nequeo superos, Achaeronta movebo! -Virgil

  • Curious and Froggy,

    Sounds great.  They say $55 per barrel oil from algae is feasible. 

     

    Toward freedom, Bobby
  • liberty1:

    Curious and Froggy,

    Sounds great.  They say $55 per barrel oil from algae is feasible. 

    Let's see if their pessimistic projection of ~$84/barrel algoil is reasonable before we assume the more optimistic ~$55/barrel number is feasible.

    I started going through the paper last night before bed.  I'll try and finish it in spare time before I go to sleep tonight.

    Algae Man? AMiller?  Froggy?  Liberty?  Mike? Can you all do the same?

    Between the 6 of us and any other critical eye with the right experience (I'm sure there are more of you out there than the ones I listed), I'm confident we can give this paper a review at least as rigorous as a doctoral commitee does to a submitted PhD thesis.

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)