|
|
|
Latest post 08-04-2008 07:47 PM by mazroy. 133 replies.
-
03-26-2005 11:31 PM
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mike Briggs


- Joined on 09-09-2002
- Dover, NH
- Posts 8,421
|
quote: Originally posted by vainolaiho
I have seen articles about Idaho's University.
Finnish nobelist Artturi Iivari Virtanen made already in the 1930'ees tests with isothiocyanates.
Using SVO based on mustard seems to work quite well. In long run I believe, that the level 5,75% biocomponent in the diesel fuel need no biodieseltreatment.
I'd prefer to use no diesel fuel at all though. SVO would be considerably more difficult to transition to than biodiesel, since the existing distribution system cannot handle SVO well, and all vehicles would need to be modified.
quote: Using SVO is easy, profitable and safe. In my first lesson in Milwaukee in 1997 I was happy to tell that lean mustard seed oil decreases Nox'es ( biodiesel tends to increase them ).
It depends entirely on what the engine is "tuned" for. An engine with the injection timing retarded slightly does not increase NOx when running biodiesel. This can be accomplished easily with sensors to detect the amount of biodiesel and adjust the timing accordingly.
|
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mike Briggs


- Joined on 09-09-2002
- Dover, NH
- Posts 8,421
|
quote: Originally posted by vainolaiho
Should we do more R&D work to make injection systems with better performance for SVO ?
The problem is that to make engines with very low emissions and high efficiencies, you end up needing to do things that are less compatible with SVO (higher injection pressures, etc.).
quote: The extra cost making biodiesel is so high and the loss of energy so big that it could be worthwile.
The incremental cost for producing biodiesel from oil isn't all that big - currently around 20-30 cents per gallon for industrial plants, including the price of the methanol. Something we are working on here should be able to cut that by a significant margin, perhaps 50% or more. With modern processing plants, the energy required isn't all that much, and new improvements are making it less and less.
Another significant barrier with SVO is fuel transport. It simply couldn't be pumped through existing pipelines, and most other transportation options would likely run into problems.
Also, there is simply a huge benefit from being able to use a fuel in existing vehicles without needing modifications - a benefit you have with biodiesel, but not really with SVO. SVO is fine for limited applications, where you don't need to deal with the transportation issues, engines (or stationary burners) that can handle it are already in use, etc.
|
|
-
-
-
|
|
|
Home |
Blogs |
Forums |
Promote Biodiesel |
Testimonials |
Links |
Downloads | Top of the page
Forum Navigator:
|
|
|
|